The
following bills of interest to the legal community were acted upon
in June:
AB
171,
by Assemblyman Jim Beall, D-San Jose, which, as amended, would implement
the Court of Appeal decision in In re Estate of Claeyssens, 161 C.A.
4th 465, by eliminating graduated probate filing fees and establishing
a uniform fee of $320, payable upon filing of a party's first petition
or objections. The bill, which passed the Assembly last year in a
different form, passed the Senate Judiciary Committee June 11 by a
vote of 5-0.
AB
268,
by Assemblyman Charles Calderon, D-Industry, which would expand the
circumstances under which a witness is deemed unavailable for purposes
of establishing an exception to the hearsay rule. The bill, which
passed the Assembly June 5 of last year by a vote of 77-0, was gutted
in the Senate June 19 and replaced with unrelated content.
AB
357,
by Assemblyman Tony Mendoza, D-Norwalk, which would allow candidates
to use donated funds, not subject to campaign contribution limits,
to pay attorney fees for recounts and related litigation. The bill,
which passed the Assembly last year by a vote of 74-0, was amended
in the Senate June 16, stripped of the existing language, and replaced
with unrelated content.
AB
360,
by Assemblyman Wilmer Carter, D-Rialto, which, as amended, would make
changes relating to the juvenile justice system, authorizing counties
to establish "restorative" programs. The bill passed the
Assembly earlier this year, was amended in the Senate June 2, and
passed the Senate Public Safety Committee June 10 by a vote of 4-1.
AB
1405,
by Assemblyman Bill Maze, R-Visalia, which, as amended, would provide
for the confidentiality of statements made by juveniles in the course
of assessments under Welfare and Institutions Sec. 241.1. The bill,
which passed the Assembly last year, was amended in the Senate June
24 to eliminate a provision allowing the minor's counsel to waive
confidentiality.
AB
1679,
by Assemblywoman Noreen Evans, D-Santa Rosa, which, as amended, would
open court files in paternity actions to the parties and their attorneys
or agents without the necessity of a court order, although judgments
would remain sealed. The bill would, with respect to all others, retain
the requirement of a court order, granted only in "exceptional
cases," before any part of a court file in a paternity case could
be made public. The bill passed the Senate June 19 by a vote of 35-0,
passed the Assembly June 23 by a vote of 77-0, and was sent to the
governor.
AB
1820,
by Assemblywoman Cathleen Galgiani, D-Stockton, which would revise
the formula by which counties are reimbursed for the cost of homicide
trials. The bill, which passed the Assembly May 19 by a vote of 76-0,
was amended in the Senate June 11.
AB
1852,
by Assemblyman Kevin Jeffries, R-Murrieta, which would make it an
infraction, rather than a crime, to participate in a sports betting
pool, as long as no one is being paid to "book" bets. The
bill passed the Assembly May 8 by a vote of 65-4 and was referred
to the Senate Committee on Public Safety. As amended in the Senate
May 23 and June 17, the change would not apply where the amount of
the pool is more than $2,500 or where the wager was placed online,
and would reduce the maximum fine for the first offense to $250.
AB
1873,
by Assemblyman Ted Lieu, D-Torrance, which would permit a party or
witness, with the permission of the court, to appear by telephone
in small claims court. The bill, which passed the Assembly April 14
by a vote of 67-4, was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee
June 24 by a vote of 4-1.
AB
2095,
by Assemblyman Mike Davis, D-Los Angeles, which would require disclosure
of the identities of persons who advise the governor with respect
to judicial appointments and require members of the State Bar Commission
on Judicial Nominees Evaluation to complete two hours of training
each year "in the areas of fairness and bias in the judicial
appointments process." The bill, which passed the Assembly May
19 by a vote of 46-27, was amended in the Senate June 12 and approved
by a 3-2 vote of the Judiciary Committee June 25.
AB
2448,
by Assemblyman Michael Feuer, D-West Hollywood, which, as amended,
would revise standards and procedures for granting fee waivers in
civil cases, providing among other things, for a lien against a plaintiff's
recovery for waived fees, if the amount of the settlement or judgment
exceeds $10,000. The bill, which passed the Assembly May 8 by a vote
of 50-25, was amended in the Senate June 16 and approved by a 3-2
vote of the Judiciary Committee June 25.
AB
3049,
which, as amended, would authorize the State Bar to charge dues for
next year at the current $400 rate, plus a $10 annual fee that would
be authorized through 2013 and would be used solely to acquire a southern
California headquarters to which the State Bar would relocate once
its current lease expires in 2014. The bill passed the Senate Judiciary
Committee June 10 by a vote of 4-1, then was amended in the Senate
on June 18 to require that the building fee money be credited back
if the new facilities are not contracted for by the time the current
lease expires.
SB
1407,
by Sen. Don Perata, D-Oakland, which would authorize a major court
facilities capital outlay program for the improvement, renovation
and replacement of court facilities. Under SB 1407, up to $5 billion
in lease revenue bonds would be issued to finance approximately 40
court facilities projects.The projects would be selected by the Judicial
Council, and the state bonds would be financed by revenues that would
be generated by raising certain civil and criminal fees and assessments.
The bill would exempt such facilities from existing law requiring
that plans for the construction or renovation of facilities where
persons are detained be submitted to the Corrections Standards Authority
for its recommendations. The bill passed the Senate as an urgency
measure May 29 by a vote of 28-8 and was amended in the Assembly June
18. |