August
31, 2009 |
![]() ![]() |
A report on where |
Arraignment for Judge John T. Doyle on DUI Charges Delayed Until Sept. 10...Ninth Circuit Allows Jailed and Disbarred Lawyer Richard I. Fine to Appeal Denial of Habeas Corpus...L.A. Times Counsel Karlene Goller Floated for Appointment to Superior Court |
John
T. Doyle Doyle, a Superior Court judge since 2000, is scheduled to be arraigned Sept. 10 on drunk driving charges. Officials said he was arrested about 11:15 p.m. July 2 after officers with the LAPD's South Traffic Division pulled him over in the 4500 block of Don Felipe Drive following a minor traffic collision. The arraignment was continued from July 31. Harvey
Silberman Silberman,
a former commissioner who was elected last year as a judge, pled
not guilty July 23 to charges of solicitation to commit bribery
and solicitation to induce a candidate not to run for public office.
He was indicted, along with two campaign consultants, on June 24;
the charges stem from last year's contest in which Silberman defeated
Deputy District Attorney Serena Murillo for an open seat on the
court. Mervyn
H. Wolf Wolf,
a lawyer for 40 years, is scheduled for jury trial on five felony
embezzlement counts Sept. 10 before Los Angeles Superior Court Judge
Bob Bowers Jr. The trial was continued from May 5. Richard
I. Fine The
Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals this month granted a certificate
of appealability, allowing Fine to challenge the denial of his petition
for writ of habeas corpus. Roosevelt
Dorn Dorn,
who served on the Inglewood Municipal Court and the Los Angeles
Superior Court from 1979 until his election as mayor of Inglewood
in 1997, pled not guilty on July 24 of last year to charges of conflict
of interest and misappropriation of public funds. He is alleged
to have personally benefited from a loan program designed to assist
city employees in purchasing and improving housing within the city.
Mitchell
Roth The
attorney general sued Roth, a candidate for the Los Angeles Superior
Court in 2004, and foreclosure consultant Paul Noe Jr. on July 6,
alleging that the two defrauded some 2,000 desperate homeowners
into paying exorbitant fees for "phony lawsuits" to forestall
foreclosure proceedings. LaJetta
Y. Wright Wright, a former treasurer of the Black Women Lawyers Association of Los Angeles, faces possible disbarment after pleading guilty July 29 to charges she embezzled $26,000 from the group in 2004. Wright, who repaid the money some time ago, is expected to be placed on probation for one year, with no jail time, at her sentencing Dec. 2. |
![]()
There has been a vacancy on the court since Judge Stephen Trott took senior status Dec. 31, 2004. There is also a newly created position that has not been filled, and Judge Michael Daly Hawkins is scheduled to take senior status Feb. 12, 2010. |
President
Obama made his first nomination to the court July 31, tapping Los
Angeles Superior Court Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen to succeed Judge
Nora Manella, who resigned to become a justice of this district's
Court of Appeal in 2006. |
![]()
There are no vacancies. |
![]() Second District Justice
Jeffrey Johnson was sworn in Aug. 3 as a member of Div. One. He was
confirmed last month but delayed taking the oath in order to complete
his work as a U.S. magistrate judge for the Central District of California.
Justice Fred Morrison retired at the end of January. Justice Rodney Davis retired Feb. 16. The name of Sacramento Superior Court Judge Jaime R. Roman has been sent to the JNE Commission as a possible appointee to the court. Fifth District Former state Sen. Charles Poochigian faces a Sept. 24 confirmation hearing after being nominated by the governor to succeed Justice Thomas Harris, who died Nov. 12 of last year. Seats in other districts are filled. |
Los Angeles Superior Court
|
Legislation of Interest to the Legal Community
|
The
following bills of interest to the legal community were acted upon
in August: •SB
150, by Sen. Roderick Wright, D-Inglewood, which would amend provisions
related to sentence enhancements to eliminate the requirement, the
validity of which is in question as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court
decision in Cunningham v. California, that when there are three possible
terms for the enhancement, the judge must select the middle term in
the absence of aggravating or mitigating factors. The bill would amend
Proposition 21, and thus requires a two-thirds majority. As amended,
the bill would have a sunset date of Jan. 1, 2011. The bill, which
passed the Senate June 3 by a vote of 39-0, passed the Assembly Appropriations
Committee Aug. 27 by a vote of 17-0. |
Copyright Metropolitan News Company, 1999-2009