April
30,
2009

A report on where
things
stand



Attorney Mervyn Wolf Faces May 5 Trial for Embezzling From Clients...Richard I. Fine Remains Jailed for Contempt While Awaiting Action on Habeas Corpus Petition...Los Angeles Superior Court Commissioner Michael Duffy Expected to Retire After Stroke



Judges, Lawyers Under Scrutiny

Mervyn H. Wolf
Encino Attorney

Wolf, a lawyer for 40 years, is scheduled for jury trial on five felony embezzlement counts May 5 before Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Bob Bowers Jr.

Wolf is accused of having taken settlement funds from his clients in multiple personal injury, workers' compensation, and wrongful termination cases between June 2003 and June 2004. He allegedly deposited settlement checks into his clients' trust accounts, and then embezzled the funds.

Wolf was placed on involuntary inactive status by the State Bar Court July 10 of last year and faces discipline in connection with several matters. He has had extensive contacts with the disciplinary system, having been placed on three years' probation in 1995 for misconduct in three matters, suspended 45 days in 1998 for failing to comply with a condition of the earlier probation, placed on inactive status for a month in 2002 for failure to comply with MCLE requirements, and served a month on suspension in 2004 for nonpayment of bar dues.

Richard I. Fine
Disbarred Attorney

Fine, who was disbarred in February after a largely successful 35-year career, filed a federal habeas corpus petition March 19. He contends that he was denied due process and a jury trial when he was jailed for contempt March 4 by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge David Yaffe.

The judge ordered Fine jailed for as long as he refuses to respond to questions asked at a judgment debtor examination, and jailed for five days for holding himself out as entitled to practice law after being placed on involuntary inactive status by the State Bar Court.

Fine was disbarred based on State Bar Court Hearing Judge Richard Honn's finding in November 2007 that the lawyer engaged in a concerted campaign of litigation designed to harass judicial officers who had ruled against him, in particular Los Angeles Superior Court Com­mis­sioner Bruce Mitchell.

Fine said he will seek review of the disbarment in the U.S. Supreme Court on free speech and due process grounds. He contends the State Bar is retaliating against him for engaging in protected speech, while the State Bar says that Fine engaged in moral turpitude by continuously relitigating issues on which he had been ruled against.

Fine is also suing the State Bar in U.S. District Court, claiming that the statute allowing a finding of moral turpitude based on acts that are not crimes is unconstitutional.

The attorney claims to be the victim of a vendetta by Los Angeles Superior Court judicial officers based on his litigation of suits in which he challenged Los Angeles County's payment of benefits to Superior Court judges. Those benefits were declared unconstitutional-as not being authorized by the Legislature-by the Fourth District Court of Appeal last year in a suit brought by the advocacy group Judicial Watch, but the governor in February signed into law a bill that allows counties to continue paying benefits to supplement the salaries of Superior Court judges and immunizing officials against any liability for having unlawfully paid such benefits in the past.

Roosevelt Dorn
Former Los Angeles Superior Court Judge

Dorn, who served on the Inglewood Municipal Court and the Los Angeles Superior Court from 1979 until his election as mayor of Inglewood in 1997, pled not guilty on July 24 of last year, to charges of conflict of interest and misappropriation of public funds. He is alleged to have personally benefited from a loan program designed to assist city employees in purchasing and improving housing within the city.

A pretrial conference has been set for May 13 before Judge Michael Pastor at the Foltz Criminal Justice Center.


Judiciary: Vacancies, Appointments




Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

There has been a vacancy on the court since Judge Stephen Trott took senior status Dec. 31, 2004. There is also a newly created position as of Jan. 21, and Judge Michael Daly Hawkins is scheduled to take senior status Feb. 12, 2010.

 

There are three vacancies on the court.

Judge Nora Manella resigned to become a justice of this district's Court of Appeal in 2006. Judge George Schiavelli resigned Oct. 5 of last year. Judge Alicemarie Stotler took senior status Jan. 5.

Judge Florence-Marie Cooper has scheduled her retirement for March 15 of next year.




There are no vacancies.


First District

Justice William Stein retired from Div. One at the end of August. Justice Linda M. Gemello retired from Div. Five Jan. 4. Justice Douglas E. Swager retired from Div. One Dec. 31.

Second District

Justice Miriam Vogel retired July 3 from Div. One, which also has a vacancy as a result of Robert Mallano's elevation to presiding justice.

Presiding Justice Candace Cooper retired from Div. Eight Dec. 31. Acting Presiding Justice Laurence Rubin's name has been submitted by the governor to the Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation as a candidate to replace Cooper.

Third District

Justice Fred Morrison retired at the end of January. Justice Rodney Davis retired Feb. 16.

Fifth District

Justice Thomas Harris died Nov. 12.

Seats in other districts are filled.

Los Angeles Superior Court


Los Angeles attorney Mark A. Borenstein and Deputy District Attorney Christian R. Gullón were appointed judges of the court March 26 to fill vacancies created by the Sept. 15 retirements of Judges Coleman Swart and Suzanne Person.

There remain vacancies as a result of the retirements of Judges Robert O'Neill April 6, Kathryn A. Stoltz Feb. 20, Rodney Forneret Dec. 5, Kenneth Black Nov. 5, and Darlene Schempp Sept. 30 and the decisions of the Judicial Council to convert the seats formerly held by Com­missioners Ronald Rose, Harvey Silberman, and Harold Vites to judgeships. Rose was among the 17 new judges named by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in November, while Silberman was sworn in in January to the judicial seat he won in last June's primary and Vites retired March 31.

A newly created position on the court was to have been funded as of last June 1, but legislation in response to the state budget crisis postponed the effective date, first to June 1 of this year, and then to June 1 of next year.

Judge Aviva K. Bobb said she expects to retire in May or June, but has not yet set an official date. Judge William Pounders has said he plans to retire at the end of the year. Judge Alice Hill's last working day is May 29; she is resigning effective June 12 to become counselor to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano.

Judge Michael J. Farrell is retiring July 7. Judge Josh Fredricks said he expects to retire Sept. 12, when he becomes eligible for maximum benefits.

Among those whose names have gone to the State Bar Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation as possible appointees to the court are former Deputy District Attorney Christopher Darden, now in private practice; former Assistant U.S. Attorney David P. Vaughn, now a managing director of the litigation and consulting firm FTI Consulting, Inc.; criminal defense specialist Steven Cron of Santa Monica; Los Angeles Assistant City Attorney Gary Geuss; Los Angeles Deputy City Attorneys Timothy R. Saito, Richard Kraft and Edward J. Perez; state Deputy Attorneys General Steven D. Matthews, Emilio E. Varanini IV, Victoria Wilson, Paul Roadarmel Jr., Robert S. Henry and Kenneth Byrne; Administrative Law Judge Robert Helfand; Deputy District Attorneys Steven I. Katz, Alison S. Matsumoto, Shellie Samuels, Jeffrey Gootman, John D. Harlan II and Laura Laesecke; Commissioners Cynthia Zuzga, Henry Hull, John Slawson, Rocky L. Crabb, Michael Convey, Joel Wallenstein, Dennis Mulcahy, Marilyn Kading Martinez, Mary Lou Katz Byrne, Steven Berman and Loren DiFrank; U.S. District Court attorney Amy L. Lew; Irvine attorney Raymond Earl Brown; Deputy Federal Public Defender Angel Navarro; Deputy Alternate Public Defender Jerome J. Haig; Deputy Public Defender Lisa Brackelmans; Securities and Exchange Commission lawyer Martin Joseph Murphy; Los Angeles attorneys Howard Fields, Michael Wilner, Shan K. Thever, John L. Carlton, David Fields, Adrienne Krikorian, Eulanda Matthews and Lawrence P. Brennan Jr.; Century City attorney Howard S. Fredman; Pasadena attorney Warren Gilbert; Glendale attorney Mark J. MacCarley; and Westlake Village attorney Michael Nebenzahl.

Los Angeles Deputy City Attorney Matthew C. St. George and Deputy Public Defender Kenneth H. Taylor were elected commissioners last month, succeeding Victor Greenberg and Maren Nelson, who were appointed judges. St. George is sitting in Alhambra and Taylor at Metropolitan Court.
Commissioner H.M. "Trip" Webster III retired March 30 and Commissioner Gretchen Taylor March 31. Court officials said that successors to Taylor and Webster, and to Commissioner Kirkland Nyby, who retired earlier, will be elected soon.

Commissioners William Dodson and Michael Duffy are on long-term medical leave. Duffy, who sources said suffered a minor stroke in the Alhambra courthouse parking lot, is expected to retire.

Commisioner John T. Raffurty will preside at the West Los Angeles Courthouse for the last time May 22 and will retire July 6.


Legislation of Interest to the Legal Community

The following bills of interest to the legal community were acted upon in April:

AB 27, by Assemblyman Kevin Jeffries, R-Lake Elsinore, which would increase the amount of damage required for a person to be guilty of aggravated arson from $5.65 million to $6.5 million, and extend the sunset date for existing provisions relating to property damage from Jan. 1, 2010 until Jan. 1, 2014. The bill was sent to the Ap­propriations Committee suspense file April 1.

AB 58, by Jeffries, which would reduce to an infraction, punishable by a fine of no more than $250, the offense of participating in a sports betting pool, when the offender is not being paid to operate the pool, the pool is not being operated online, and the amount at stake is no more than $2,500. A similar bill was vetoed last year by the governor. The bill was approved April 1 by the Govern­mental Organization Committee by a vote of 18-1 and was re-referred to the Public Safety Committee, which passed it April 21 by a vote of 7-0.

AB 168, by Assemblyman Pedro Nava, D-Santa Barbara, which would authorize access to some sealed juvenile court files where the offender later becomes the subject of a commitment proceeding under the Sexually Violent Predator Act. The bill was amended in the Assembly April 14 to specify protections for the confidentiality of the records.

AB 170, by Assemblyman Tony Mendoza, D-Norwalk, which would tighten the rules restricting use of court reporters' rough drafts in place of official transcripts. The bill was approved by the Judiciary Committee March 17 by a vote of 10-0 and by the full Assembly March 23 by a vote of 77-0.

AB 316, by Assemblyman Jose Solorio, D-Anaheim, which would, among other things, allow a wrongfully convicted defendant two years after being exonerated to bring a malpractice action against his or her attorney; extend from six months to two years the time following exoneration in which such a defendant may bring a wrongful imprisonment claim against the state; and eliminate the defense, in connection with any such claim against the state, that the defendant negligently contributed to his or her arrest or conviction. The bill passed the Public Safety Committee April 1 by a vote of 7-0 and was re-referred to the Appropriations Committee.

AB 362, by Assemblyman Jeff Miller, R-Mission Viejo, which, as amended, would create a new crime, punishable as a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail and/or a fine of up to $1,000 to steal, damage, or destroy election campaign signs. The bill passed the Public Safety Committee April 21 by a vote of 6-1, but was amended in the Assembly April 28 to make the offense a misdemeanor rather than a "wobbler" as under the previous version of the bill.

AB 375, by Assemblyman Jim Nielsen, R-Redding/Yuba City, which would clarify the requirements for an ex parte change or modification of child custody based on a finding of recent sexual abuse or domestic violence. The bill was scheduled for a vote in the Assembly yesterday.

AB 459, by Assemblywoman Bonnie Lowenthal, D-Long Beach, which would allow a party to a dissolution of marriage action to waive the requirement of financial disclosure by the other party. The bill, which is sponsored by the Family Law Section of the State Bar and has no apparent opposition, passed the Assembly April 16 by a vote of 70-0.

AB 461, by Assemblyman Ted Gaines, R-Roseville, which would reenact the expired Economic Crimes Act of 1992, which, among other things, limits the circumstances in which a defendant who steals more than $50,000 may be placed on probation. The bill was referred to the Appropriations Committee suspense file April 23.

AB 590, by Feuer, which would create a right to appointed counsel for some indigent civil litigants under pilot programs to be established by the Judicial Council and funded through increases in some court fees. The bill passed the Judiciary Committee April 20 by a vote of 7-2.

AB 663, by Assemblyman Dave Jones, D-Sacramento, which would, among other things, require the Judicial Council to set up a pilot project for the use of interpreters in civil proceedings. The bill was approved by the Judiciary Committee April 21 by a vote of 7-2.

AB 674, by Assemblywoman Mary Salas, D-Chula Vista, which would establish a deferred entry of judgment program and a preconviction drug diversion program for veterans who suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder or traumatic brain injury and who commit specified offenses. A Public Safety Committee hearing scheduled for April 21 was cancelled at the request of the author.

AB 680, by Assemblyman Jerry Hill, D-San Mateo, which would increase some fees for the services of sheriffs and marshals. A Judiciary Committee hearing scheduled for April 27 was postponed by the committee.

AB 942, by the Judiciary Committee, which, as amended, would require the Judicial Council to assess the need for creation of additional judicial positions to handle family law and juvenile cases, and would authorize conversion of subordinate judicial officer positions, over and above those conversions previously authorized, to judgeships in order to handle family law and juvenile court cases. The bill was approved by the committee April 21 by a vote of 10-0 and was re-referred to the Appropriations Committee.

AB 984, by Nava, which, as amended, would revise the requirements governing accreditation of law schools. The bill was amended in the Assembly April 13 and re-referred to the Judiciary Committee.

AB 1040, by Assemblywoman Audra Strickland, R-Westlake Village, which would require that an appeal from the approval of a class action settlement be argued within 120 days of the filing of the notice of appeal. A Judiciary Committee hearing scheduled for April 21 was cancelled at the author's request.

AB 1046, by Assemblyman Joel Anderson, R-El Cajon, which would increase the homestead exemption from execution on a judgment to $75,000, or $100,000 if the judgment debtor or his or her spouse who resides in the homestead is, at the time of the sale, a member of a family unit, and one member of the family unit is without an interest, or with only a limited interest, as specified, in the homestead, and to $175,000 if the judgment debtor or the spouse of the judgment debtor who resides in the homestead is, at the time of the sale, 65 years of age or older, disabled, or 55 years of age or older with a limited income. The bill passed the Judiciary Committee April 14 by a vote of 10-0, and passed the Appropriations Committee April 22 by a vote of 16-0.

AB 1163, by Assemblyman Van Tran, which deals with the attorney-client privilege as applied to the client's estate. The bill passed the Judiciary Committee April 21 by a vote of 10-0.

SB 39, by Sen. John Benoit, R-Bermuda Dunes, which would, as amended, enact the Good Samaritan Protection Act which would provide that medical, law enforcement, and emergency personnel who in good faith, and not for compensation render emergency care at the scene of an emergency shall not be liable for any civil damages resulting from any act or omission, and that any person, not including medical, law enforcement, and emergency personnel, who in good faith, and not for compensation, renders emergency medical or nonmedical care or assistance at the scene of an emergency shall not be liable for any civil damages resulting from any act or omission, as long as that act or omission does not constitute gross negligence or willful or wanton misconduct. A Judiciary Committee hearing has been scheduled for Tuesday.


SB 46
, by Sen. Elaine Alquist, D-San Jose, which would eliminate the statute of limitations for certain sex crimes. The bill was held without recommendation following a hearing April 21 in the Public Safety Committee.


SB 59
, by Sen. Robert Huff, R-Diamond Bar, which would provide that good cause exists to continue a trial for violation of the California Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act when the assigned prosecutor has another case in progress, within specific limitations. The bill was amended in the Senate April 21 and re-referred to the Public Safety Committee.


SB 108, by Sen. Mimi Walters, R-Laguna Niguel, which, as previously amended, would have added charter schools to the list of public agencies covered by the California Tort Claims Act. Those provisions were eliminated by amendment April 21.

SB 150, by Sen. Roderick Wright, D-Inglewood, which would amend provisions related to sentence enhancements to eliminate the requirement, the validity of which is in question as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Cunningham v. California, that when there are three possible terms for the enhancement, the judge must select the middle term in the absence of aggravating or mitigating factors. The bill would amend Proposition 21, and thus requires a two-thirds majority. The Committee on Public Safety approved the bill April 15 by a vote of 7-0. As amended April 16, the bill would have a sunset date of Jan. 1, 2011. The bill was re-referred to the Appropriations Committee and was sent to the Appropriations suspense file April 27.

SB 151, by Sen. Diane Ducheny, D-San Diego, which would require the Judicial Council to conduct a pilot program, ending on January 1, 2015, for the operation of up to 10 court-based reentry programs for parolees who would benefit from community drug treatment or mental health treatment. The bill passed the Committee on Public Safety April 21 by a vote of 7-0 and was re-referred to the Appropriations Committee, which has a hearing scheduled for Monday.


SB 154
, by Benoit, which, as amended, would grant the Department of Motor Vehicles the authority, which the Court of Appeal ruled last year it does not have under existing law, to suspend the license of a driver convicted of operating a boat under the influence of drugs or alcohol. The bill passed the Public Safety Committee April 14 by a vote of 6-0, but was amended in the Senate April 28 to limit its effect to a driver who had also been convicted of driving or boating under the influence during the previous seven years.


SB 203, Sen. Tom Harman, R-Costa Mesa, which would abrogate the holdings in People v. Hertzig (2007) 156 Cal.App.4th 398 and People v. Manfredi (2008) 169 Cal.App.4th 622 by providing that a person in possession of multiple obscene images of children is guilty of a separate crime for each such image. The bill was amended in the Senate April 16.

SB 319, by Harman, which, as amended, would require a trial court to wait at least 90 days before issuing a new summons to a prospective juror who fails to appear, and would eliminate the Jan. 1, 2010 sunset date of the law that allows a court to impose monetary sanctions on a prospective juror who fails to appear. The bill was amended in the Senate April 22.

SB 377, by Sen. Ellen Corbett, D-San Leandro, which would, subject to appropriations, authorize creation of 50 new superior court judgeships. The bill passed the Judiciary Committee April 14 by a vote of 5-0, passed the Appropriations Committee April 27 by a vote of 13-0, and was placed on the Appropriations suspense file.

SB 393, by Harman, which would reduce the interest rate on judgments, and on personal injury awards that exceed the plaintiff's rejected offer of settlement, from 10 percent to 2 percent above prime. A hearing set for April 14 was cancelled at the request of the author and is now scheduled for May 12 before the Judiciary Committee.

SB 399, by Sen. Leland Yee, D-San Francisco, would permit a trial court to review a life-without-parole prison sentence after 10 years, if the defendant was a minor when the crime was committed and certain other requirements are met. The bill passed the Senate Public Safety Committee April 14 by a vote of 5-2 and was amended in the Senate April 28.

SB 440, by Sen. Jeff Denham, R-Modesto, which, as amended, would add aggravated child abuse, physical child abuse, animal abuse, elder abuse, and aggravated escape or attempted escape to the list of serious and violent felonies for which enhanced penalties may be imposed. The bill was amended April 2.

SB 641
, by Corbett, which would extend the State Bar's dues authority to 2010 with no increase in dues. The bill is scheduled for hearing in the Judiciary Committee May 12.

SB 669, by Sen. Dennis Hollingsworth, R-Temecula, which
, as amended, would provide that, in a hearing on the issue of whether a sexually violent predator should be conditionally released or unconditionally discharged, the committed person's failure to participate in or complete the State Department of Mental Health Sex Offender Commitment Program may be considered evidence that his or her condition has not changed, and a jury would be so instructed. The bill was amended April 14 and re-referred to the Public Safety Committee.



 

 

 


Copyright Metropolitan News Company, 1999-2009