April
29,
2005

A report on where
things
stand



Special Masters Issue Findings in Case of Judge Kevin Ross...Results of Commissioner Balloting Due Today...Senior U.S. District Judge Resigns to Become Private Judge



Judges, Lawyers Under Scrutiny

Kevin A. Ross
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge

A panel of special masters last week found that Ross, a judge since 1998:

Committed willful misconduct by adding chargesófor which there was no factual basisóagainst a defendant, arraigning her without counsel present, and summarily remanding her to custody.

Engaged in prejudicial, but not willful, misconduct by disregarding one defendant's right to counsel, becoming embroiled in the case and acting in a prosecutorial role; disregarding another defendant's right to a formal probation violation hearing and continuing the proceedings in the absence of her counsel; revealing on a public television program information he had learned while presiding over a confidential juvenile matter; and participating in the filming of a pilot for a television program which was "degrading to the judge and all the participants" in the course of which his name and title were used for promotional purposes and he arbitrated actual disputes.

Engaged in improper conduct, but not prejudicial misconduct, by making ex parte telephone contact with a defendant.

Violated no canons of judicial ethics by speaking on a radio program about a statewide ballot proposition during courtoom hours, participating in a community outreach program different from the one for which he had obtained an approved leave without notifying the court of the change, or commenting during three public television appearances about legal issues involved in two high-profile pending cases in which he was not personally involved.

The discipline to be imposed, if any, will be determined by the Commission on Judicial Performance after further briefing and arguments.

Ross was the subject of a misconduct hearing last November. Ventura Superior Court Judge Vincent J. O'Neill, Fourth District Court of Appeal Justice Judith Haller, and San Bernardino Superior Court Judge Michael A. Smith were the special masters for the hearing, which was postponed from September after the commission brought additional charges.

Ross admitted that in one case, he inappropriately ordered a traffic court defendant jailed because he believed she had provided false information about her identity, and that in another matter, he improperly interrogated an unrepresented defendant after the man said he wanted to consult with an attorney.

Ross also acknowledged problems with his 2002 arrangement with a production company for a show to be called "Mobile Court." Ross was to resolve small claims cases, with the parties stipulating to be bound by his rulings.

In making the deal, the masters said, Ross violated Canon 2B(2), which provides that a judge "shall not lend the prestige of judicial office to advance the pecuniary or personal interests of the judge or others."

Ross' attorney and agent testified that his name and title were not supposed to be used in connection with the presentation. Ross said he unintentionally violated the ethics code by signing arbitration awards in favor of the winning "litigants," since judges cannot engage in private alternative dispute resolution, but denied that he abused his office by participating in the effort to sell the program.

The charges rejected by the masters involved appearances by Ross, a former prosecutor, on the KCET public television program "Life and Times Tonight" during 2001 and 2002. Ross, a frequent guest on the public affairs discussion program, gained a seat on the Inglewood Municipal Court in 1998 by defeating Judge Lawrence Mason and became a Superior Court judge upon unification in 2000.

Among the canons of the Code of Judicial Ethics violated by the four appearances, the CJP asserted, is Canon 3B(9), which says that a judge shall not shall not "make any public comment about a pending or impending proceeding in any court."

Both of the unauthorized absence allegations also related to public appearances made by the judge.

Ross testified that his television appearances were consistent with the California courts' efforts to educate the public on the judicial process and noted that other judicial officers had appeared with him or on similar programs. He also contended that the restrictions on judicial comment on pending cases are unconstitutional.


Judiciary: Vacancies, Appointments




Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

There are four vacancies on the court.

Judge Stephen S. Trott took senior status Dec. 31, Judge A. Wallace Tashima took senior status June 30, Judge James Browning took senior status Sept. 1, 2000, and Judge Thomas G. Nelson took senior status Nov. 14, 2003.

The Judiciary Committee recently sent the nomination of William G. Myers III, to succeed Nelson, to the floor on a party-line vote of 10-8. President Bush resubmitted Myers' nomination on Feb. 14.

Republican senators tried and failed in July of last year to force a floor vote on the nomination of Myers. The vote on the motion to invoke cloture was 53-44, short of the three-fifths required, with both California senators voting against.

Myers, who was first nominated on May 15, 2003, is a former solicitor of the Department of the Interior and now practices law in Boise, Idaho. He has drawn opposition from native American activists and environmental groups.

His supporters say he holds mainstream, balanced views on environmental and other issues.

U.S. Attorney Debra Yang of the Central District of California is reportedly under consideration for appointment to the court.

 

Judge Gary L. Taylor, who took senior status Dec. 8, will leave the court at the end of June. Judge Robert J. Timlin took senior status Feb. 1. Judge Terry J. Hatter Jr. took senior status April 22 and Judge Dickran M. Tevrizian will do so Aug. 5.

Senior Judge Lourdes G. Baird retired this month to become a private judge.




There are no vacancies. One would be created if the Senate confirms Justice Janice Rogers Brown to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

Brown's nomination to that court was resubmitted Feb. 14, and was approved by the Judiciary Committee on a 10-8 party-line vote last week.

She was originally nominated July 25, 2003 and cleared the Judiciary Committee on a vote of 10-9, but an attempt to invoke cloture and force an up-or-down vote on her nomination failed on Nov. 14, 2003. The vote was 53-43 in favor of cloture, seven short of the required three-fifths majority of the entire Senate.


Second District

Former Los Angeles Superior Court Judges Sandy Kriegler, Frances Rothshchild, and Thomas Willhite Jr. were confirmed and sworn in as justices on April 4.

Willhite fills the vacancy created last October when Norman L. Epstein, a member of Div. Four since 1990, was confirmed and sworn in as presiding justice. Kriegler fills the position left open by the retirement of Justice Reuben Ortega of Div. One on Dec. 3, while Rothschild succeeds Justice Margaret Grignon, who retired from Div. Five Dec. 31.

Justice Michael Nott retired from Div. Two April 1 but is sitting on assignment through May. Potential appointees to his seat whose names were sent to the JNE Commission include Judges Aurelio Munoz, Owen Lee Kwong, Peter Lichtman, Carl West, Ronald Coen, Chris R. Conway, Frank Y. Jackson, William Highberger and Fumiko Wasserman.

Sixth District

Monterey Superior Court Judge Wendy Clark Duffy faces a May 16 confirmation hearing. Duffy was nominated to succeed Justice William Wunderlich, who resigned April 30 of last year to become a U.S. magistrate judge based in Yosemite National Park.

Seats in other districts are filled.

Los Angeles Superior Court


Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger named Superior Court Commissioner Sanjay Kumar, Deputy District Attorney Craig Mitchell, and Deputy Public Defender Alex Ricciardulli as judges of the court April 14. The three fill vacancies created by the retirement of Judge Susan E. Isacoff July 1, and the retirements of Judges John Ouderkirk and Lawrence Crispo April 5 of last year.

Eleanor Hunter, who was a deputy district attorney when she was appointed in February, was sworn in April 11 to replace Judge Dale Fischer, who joined the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on Nov. 17, 2003.

There are currently 12 vacancies on the court.

Vacancies resulted from Judge Ronni B. MacLaren's resignation March 12 to accept appointment to the Alameda Superior Court, to which she was named Feb.23; the elevation of Judges Thomas Willhite, Sandy Kriegler, and Francis Rothschild to the Court of Appeal April 4; the retirements of Judges David Perkins and Dean Farrar Feb. 18, the retirement of Judge Thomas Stoever Feb. 14, the death of Judge C. Robert Simpson Feb. 13, the death of Judge L. Jeffrey Wiatt Feb. 9, the death of Judge Alan Buckner Dec. 12, the retirement of Judge Veronica McBeth Dec. 9, and the retirement of Judge John Harris Oct. 29.

Further vacancies will occur when Judge Judith Abrams retires tomorrow, when Judge Lorna Parnell retires on Wednesday, and when Judge Meredith Taylor retires May 11.

Judge Charles Lee is on yearlong sabbatical in China.

Among those whose names have gone to the State Bar Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation as possible appointees to the court are Deputy District Attorney Richard M. Goul; Commissioners Martha Bellinger, Stuart Rice, Ross Klein, and Roger Ito; and Referee Steven Berman.

Steff Padilla, who had been a referee, was elected earlier this month as a commissioner to succeed Michael Levanas, who was appointed a judge.

Balloting ended yesterday for three commissioner positions previously held by Mitchel Harris, H. Kirkland Jones, and Stephen Leventhal, all of whom retired March 31. The results are expected to be announced today.

Commissioner Guillermina Byrne is retiring June 6. Commissioners Patricia G. Schwartz and H. Ronald Hauptmann are also expected to retire shortly.


Legislation of Interest to the Legal Community

AB 27, by Assemblyman Gene Mullin, D-South San Francisco, which would expedite the process by which a county's costs are reimbursed after venue of a homicide trial has been transferred to that county. The bill was approved by the Judiciary Committee April 26 by a vote of 9 to 0 and was sent to the Consent Calendar on Wednesday.

AB 108, by Assemblyman Guy S. Houston, R-Walnut Creek, which would require an advertisement by a lawyer or law firm that urges a person or entity to take an action that may lead to the filing of a claim for residential construction deficiencies to disclose specified information, including the availability of alternative dispute resolution. The bill was rejected by the Assembly Judiciary Committee April 12 by a vote of 6 to 3, but could be reconsidered.

AB 176, by Assemblyman Rudy Bermudez, D-Norwalk, which as amended would provide that the classification of a Los Angeles Superior Court law clerk be changed from temporary to regular employee after 180 days of employment. The bill was approved by the Committee on Public Employees, Retirement, and Social Security April 6 by a vote of 4 to 2, amended in the Assembly April 21, and referred to the Appropriations Committee April 25.

AB 192, by Assemblyman Van Tran, R-Costa Mesa, which would limit public entity tort liability to $250,000 per person or $500,000 per occurrence, and would provide that the applicability of design immunity is a question of law rather than of fact. A scheduled hearing was postponed by the Judiciary Committee April 5.

AB 202, by Assemblyman Tom Harman, R-Huntington Beach, which would specify that the filing of a petition under the California Arbitration Law is the exclusive means by which an agreement to arbitrate may be enforced. The bill was heard by the Judiciary Committee April 12 and sent to the Consent Calendar on Wednesday.

AB 220, by the Committee on Public Safety, which would change the name of the "battered woman syndrome" defense to "intimate partner battering." The bill passed the Assembly Committee on Public Safety April 5 by a vote of 7-1, passed the Assembly April 7 by a vote of 58-12, and was sent to the Senate.

AB 262, by Assemblywoman Patty Berg, D-Eureka, which would provide that the Judicial Council may not require that a structure proposed for transfer from a county to the state for court occupancy meet a building code standard stricter than the standard adopted for county buildings in the county proposing the transfer. The bill passed the Judiciary Committee by a vote of 8-0 April 5 and was sent to the suspense file by the Appropriations Committee April 13.

AB 415,by Harman, which would repeal the Jan. 1, 2006 sunset date of legislation allowing non-California attorneys to appear in arbitration proceedings in this state. A scheduled hearing was postponed twice this month by the Judiciary Committee, which set a new hearing date of May 3, but that hearing has been postponed at the request of the author.

AB 557, by Assemblywoman Betty Karnette, D-Long Beach, which would permit the issuance of a criminal complaint upon the testimony of an honorably retired peace officer. The bill has been scheduled for a Public Safety Committee hearing April 5.

AB 1322, by Assemblywoman Noreen Evans, D-Santa Rosa, which would amend the requirement that a judge who has had discussions with an ADR provider regarding potential employment recuse himself or herself, absent waiver, from ADR-related matters. The bill, as amended in the Assembly, would provide that this is only grounds for disqualification if the discussions were initiated by the judge or involved a substantive offer of employment, and would limit disqualification to matters involving the ADR provider with which the discussions occurred. The bill passed the Assembly April 21 by a vote of 74-0 and was sent to the Senate.

AB 1528, by Assemblyman Dave Jones, D-Sacramento, which as originally introduced would have overruled the holding in Action Apartment Assn., Inc. v. City of Santa Monica (2004) 123 Cal. App. 4th 47 by declaring that certain communications by landlords to tenants are not protected by the litigation privilege. The bill was amended April 7 to delete the provisions related to the litigation privilege.

AB 1529, by Jones, which would make permanent the State Bar's authority to impose annual membership dues, increase the assessment for the Client Security Fund by $5, substantially increase dues for inactive members, and require members with income of more than $40,000 annually from all sources to pay the full amount of dues even if none of that income was derived from the practice of law. The bill is scheduled to be heard by the Judiciary Committee May 3.

AB 1553, by Evans, which would provide that any contractual limit on the time in which to seek arbitration is tolled during the pendency of a lawsuit regarding the same occurrence. The bill passed the Assembly April 11 by a vote of 45-33.

SB 56, by Sen. Joseph Dunn, D-Garden Grove, which, as amended, would authorize creation-subject to appropriations-of up to 50 new superior court judgeships in each of the next three years, plus the conversion of up to 161 subordinate judicial officer positions to judgeships, according to uniform criteria established by the Judicial Council. The bill was approved by the Judiciary Committee Wednesday by a vote of 6 to 1 and sent to the Appropriations Committee.

SB 111, by Alquist, which would permit prosecution of sex crimes against minors at any time prior to the victim's 30th birthday, replacing the current 10-year statute of limitations as well as the law permitting otherwise time-barred prosecutions to be brought, in some circumstances, up to one year after a police report is filed. The bill was approved by the Committee on Public Safety April 19 on a vote of 5 to 0 and referred to the Committee on Appropriations.

SB 151, by Sen. Nell Soto, D-Ontario, which, as amended, would make it a crime, punishable as a wobbler, for a litigant to seek to influence a judicial officer by corrupt means, including bribery, threat, intimidation, and unauthorized communication. The bill was amended in the Senate April 20 and referred back to the Committee on Public Safety, which approved the bill by a vote of 5 to 0 on Wednesday and sent it to the Appropriations Committee.

SB 232, by Sen. Liz Figueroa, D-Fremont, which as introduced would have extended to an unspecified date the July 1, 2006 sunset provision of legislation establishing the Court Reporters Board. The bill was amended April 18 to delete the provisions relating to the Court Reporters Board.

SB 265, by Sen. John Campbell, R-Costa Mesa, which would limit the number of annual holidays observed by state employees to 12 and encourage the judiciary, which currently observes 13 holidays each year, to follow suit. The bill was heard April 11 by the Committee on Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security.

SB 442, by Sen. Joseph Simitian, D-Pittsburg, which as amended would increase the jurisdictional limit of the small claims court from $5,000 to $7,500 in most cases and require attorneys serving as temporary small claims judges to take a course given by the Department of Consumer Affairs. The bill was amended April 25, was approved by the Judiciary Committee April 26 by a vote of 5 to 2, and was sent to the Appropriations Committee.

SB 815, by Sen. Deborah Ortiz, D-Sacramento, which as amended would allow a plaintiff, in lieu of service by publication, to serve the defendant's liability insurer, provided that a plaintiff who serves the defendant in this manner waives any recovery in excess of policy limits. The bill was amended April 4 and is to be heard by the Judiciary Committee May 3.



 

 

 


Copyright Metropolitan News Company, 1999-2005