Page
1
Superior Court Judge Amy Hogue Draws Write-In Opponent
By
SHERRI M. OKAMOTO, Staff Writer
Los
Angeles Superior Court Judge Amy D. Hogue has drawn a challenge from attorney MaryEtta C. Marks in the November election, the Los Angeles
County Registrar-Recorder’s Office confirmed Friday.
Marks,
who did not return a call for comment, became certified as a write-in candidate
by submitting a petition with the signatures of at least 20 qualified voters a
spokesperson for the Registrar-Recorder’s office said.
Tomorrow
is the deadline to file nomination papers for a write-in candidate, and
Marks is the only write-in candidate for the
superior court so far, the spokesperson said.
An
incumbent judge who is otherwise unopposed for re-election is susceptible to
opposition by a write-in candidate if at least 100 qualified voters petition to
allow such a candidacy no later than 83 days before the election; if that
occurs, the deadline for a write-in candidate to
qualify is 21 days before voting commences.
Private
Practitioner
According
to the State Bar, Marks, 55, operates the Law Offices of M C Marks near LAX and
was admitted to practice in 1981. She is a graduate of
Marks, who is African American, sued the county, Public
Defender’s Office, Public Defender Michael P. Judge, and several county
employees in 2000 for discriminating against her and harassing her on the basis
of her age, race and gender.
Los
Angeles Superior Court Judge Gregory W. Alarcon
granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants in that action, and his
decision was upheld in an unpublished decision by Div. Two of this district’s
Court of Appeal.
Deputy
Public Defender
Presiding Justice Roger W. Boren and
Justice Michael G. Nott, since retired, joined Justice Kathryn Doi Todd in her opinion, which noted that Marks was
employed as a deputy public defender from 1987 until she resigned in 1999 after
being repeatedly denied promotion to the position of Deputy Public Defender
III.
Doi-Todd
criticized Marks, who appeared pro per on appeal, for failing to conform her
opening brief with the requirements of the California
Rules of Court.
“For example, Marks’ brief does not
state the nature of the action, the relief sought in the trial court and the
judgment appealed from, nor does it state that the judgment is final and appealable,” Doi-Todd said.
“Furthermore, in her summary of the significant facts, the only pages of the record Marks cites are to four pages of her
unverified complaint. She cites to no evidence
in the record in her factual summary, despite the fact that the parties’ papers
on the summary judgment motions comprise 10 volumes of the clerk’s transcript.
Throughout much of her brief, it is not clear that she claimed discrimination
on the basis of race, gender and age. Indeed, nowhere in her brief does she
even identify her race or age. Moreover, Marks does not support many of her
arguments with citations to the record, as required by rule 14(a).”
The justice wrote that the court was
“tempted” to strike the brief due to its deficiencies, but elected to “simply
disregard those portions of Marks’ brief which are not supported by appropriate
reference to the record or authority.”
Doi-Todd
concluded that the county “presented ample, competent
and admissible evidence that it relied on legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons
in not promoting Marks” and that the attorney failed to raise any triable issue contesting this showing.
Hogue had no apparent connection to the
lawsuit, and efforts to reach Hogue at her courtroom last week were
unsuccessful. A clerk who answered the phone said the courtroom will be dark
until Wednesday.
A
native of
She
was a senior partner at the Los Angeles office of Pillsbury Winthrop where she
was co-chair of the firm’s Intellectual Property Group and headed its Media
Advertising and Content Team when she was tapped for the bench in 2002 by
then-Gov. Gray Davis.
Hogue’s
private practice focused mainly on media defense work, representing publishers
and media companies in litigation involving intellectual property rights,
libel, false advertising, employment, contracts, alleged frauds and commercial
torts.
She
defended media and advertising clients in right of publicity cases filed by
actor Tom Cruise, astronaut Neil Armstrong, television personality Vanna White and basketball star Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, and in
defamation actions filed by then-actor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Copyright 2010, Metropolitan News Company